Wenti yu Zhuyi [Issues and Isms]

Qin Hui, Wenti yu Zhuyi [Issues and Isms], Changchun: Changchun Chubanshe, 1999.
Qin Hui, "Bainian zhuanhuan—'shangren' yu'jiaoshi' de Zhongguohuan" [Change of the century―the China outlook of merchants" and clergymen]], 2-7.
_____, "A Q er ti" [Two views on Ah Q], 8-10.
_____, "Women gai zenyang fansi wen'ge?" [How should we reflect on the Cultural Revolution?], 10-12.
_____, "Yi quan lian qian bu dengyu 'quanqian jiaoyi'" [Using power to amass money not the same as exchanging power for money], 13-15.
_____, "'Nongmin wenti': shenme 'nongmin'? shenme 'wenti'?" [The peasant problem: what peasants, what problem?], 15-23.
_____, "Tudi - gongping - xiaolü" [Land - equity - efficiency], 24-27.
_____, "'Guan bi min fu"?" [Can officials really force people to enrich themselves?], 28-30.
_____, "'Tenglong huanniao' dang xiaoxin exing xunhuan" [Beware vicious cycles in dumping out the cage to change the bird], 31-32.
_____, "Shehui gongzheng yu Zhongguo gaigede jiangyan jiaoxun" [Social justice and empirical lessons of China's reforms], 33-40.
_____, "'Maifang quewei' yu zhengzhi tizhi gaige" [Absentee vendor and political reform], 41-45.
_____, "'Erzi dao fuqin jia chifan yao fiqian'?" ['The son should pay to eat at his father's house'?'], 46-47.
_____, "Jianyu yuyan ji qita" [Prison fables etc], 48-49.
_____, "Pujiang shang deye yu zhou" [Nights and days on the Pu River], 50-61.
_____, "Cong 'xishuo Qianlong' dao 'hushuo Yongzheng'" [From 'Qianlong jokes' to 'Yongzheng nonsense'], 62-76 .
_____, "Shiqu qiangzhide wutuobang" [The lost utopia of coercion], 77-86.
_____, "Shan'e, xinyang yu ziyou: liangge Tuomaside qishi" [Good and evil, faith and freedom: wisdom of two Thomases], 87-115.
_____, "Youle zhen wenti, caiyou zhen xuewen" [Real problems beget real scholarship) ], 134-142 .
_____, "Cuo ba Hangzhou zuo Bianzhou" [Mistaking Bianzhou for Hangzhou], 143-155.
_____, "Huai ju wei zhi, chujuzhe mi一ping 'you Zhongguo tesede xin zuopai'" [Huai tangerines are bramblefruit, quitters get lost一critique of the 'New Left with Chinese characteristics '], 156-176.
_____, "Huoqude gongzheng yu jiaoyide gongzheng" [Acquisition justice and exchange justice], 177-190.
_____, "Qidian pingdeng yu gongping jingzheng一cong 'Sangbate wenti' kan Meiguo anli" [Starting point equality and fair competition一the USA as a case in point of the 'Sombart problem'], 191-219.
_____, "Yu pingdeng yu ziyou zhizhong" [Lodging equality in the midst of freedom: critique of Lipset's new work on 'American exceptionalism'], 220-236.
_____, "Cong bugongzhengde ""gaige' dao fan gaigede 'geming'" [From unjust reforn to anti-reformist 'revolution'], 237-261.
_____, "'Lubiao' gaibian yihou: Shijichu Sha-E gaige yu ziyou zhishijiede beiju" [When the road-signs changed: fin de siècle Czarist revolution and the tragedy of the liberal intellectuals], 262-282.
_____, "Wenhua juedinglunde pinkun―chaoyue wenhua xingtai shiguan" [The poverty of cultural determinism一transcending the historiography of cultural formations], 285-349.
_____, "Cong da gongtongti bewei dao gongmin shehui一chuantong Zhongguo shehui ji qi xiandai yanjinde zai renshi" [From the big community to citizen society ―rethinking traditional Chinese society and its modern evolution], 350-402.
_____, "Keju guanliao zhide jishu, zhidu yu zhangzhi zhexue hanyi" [The techical, institutional and political meaning of the official examination system 403-415], 403-415.
_____, "Zhongguo jingjishi shangde guaiquan: 'yi jianbing yu buyi jianbing'" [A vicious circle of Chinese economic history: controlling vs releasing mergers of landed property ], 416-428.
_____, "Qiusuo yu 'zhuyi' yu 'wenti' jian" [Searching for clues between 'issues' and 'isms'], 431-468.
_____, "Jiaoyu you wenti, dan bushi 'jiaoyu wenti'" [Education has problems but they aren't educational problems 469-480], 469-480.

21 January 2005
2005年1月21日，新浪财经与CCER共同召开第二届中国经济展望论坛圆桌研讨会，本次研讨会是在中国经济展望论坛十场互联网在线讨论的基础上进行的。论坛专集《展望中国2005》新书首发式也同时举行。

秦晖:我对上一个阶段的讨论谈一点感想。刚 才吴敬琏老师和左大培两位老师谈了自己的观点，对这个问题提出了不同的意见，我们讨论经济发展战略，尤其是在经济学家的圈子里，往往忽视了经济外体制的制 约，他们两个人说的问题在我看来是一个问题，就是为什么中国的要素价格被压低？要素价格被压力，有些问题是可以解决的，是因为中国的劳动力价格特别低，但 是土地的要素价格特别低，我认为这就是非常反常的现象。

有人说这纯粹是因为最典型的原因，比如说珠江三角洲农民工的工资为什么那么低？ 批判学家认为既然是这样，就应该组织劳动力的流动，政府认为既然是这样，就与我无关。
但是，我们都知道，尤其是2004年民工荒明显的表现出所谓的劳务价格偏低其实是有非经济因素的，在我看来就是三个非经济因素：第一，集体谈判权的缺失，近几年来我们商会会制的步伐远远低于工会会制的步伐。

第二，我国农业比较效益之低，这的确是有人为因素的，一般情况下来说，在我们现在的发展阶段中，农业是个弱势产业，这是毋庸置疑的。但是，至少在前几年，农业的弱势程度要比正常条件下更为弱势，其中很重要的原因是在前几年税制改革以后，很明显的堡垒的税收，就是农民的负担比一般人的税收更大。因此，税费改革之后耕地抛荒的现象有所缓解。

第三，市场准入的限制，当时农民工进入的地方只是限于很少的地方。这几个因素是非经济的因素，刚才一些人在争究竟正确的作用是不是应该有，或者说政府是不是失灵？
我觉得即使人们认为政府应该起作用的领域，我们当前政府的作用，有时候恰恰是相反的，而不是很多人认为政府应该起作用的方向，比如说土地问题，关于土地问题，现在很多人都说土地私有制是不能搞的，我对土地私有制是不是最佳的制度选择也是有怀疑的。但是，问题在于现在很多“三农”问题专家所讲的土地不宜私有的说法和政府讲的土地不宜私有的说法是不同的，说中国一土地私有就会产生社会危机，导致战争。

政府官员说如果不搞了土地私有，中国的经济就不会发展那么快，如果政府对土地的干预是按照这种方式，恰恰可以说，正是由于土地不能私有才会造成土地兼并、两极分化，有可能造成农民战争的危险，也恰恰是由相反的原因造成的。

Wealth gap and and privatised land ownership

Qin Hui: Polarisation of wealth due to non-privatisation of land ownership

Note: the original text of this interview is no longer accessible via the above link. It is provided on a separate posting (Polarisation of wealth: Chinese text)

21 January 2005

On 21 January 2005, "Finance.sina.com" and the Center for Chinese Economic Research of Beijing University jointly held the second China Economic Outlook Roundtable Conference, hosted by the China Economic Outlook Online Conference website, and also launched a book, Outlook China 2005.

Qin Hui: Let me give some of my impressions about the previous discussion. Wu Jinglian and Zuo Dapei have just given their impressions, offering divergent views. When we discuss economic development strategy, especially among economists, external system restrictions are often neglected. The problems they discussed amount in my mind to a single one, namely why are factor prices in China depressed? Some aspects of this can be resolved, because the price of labour in China is particularly low, but the particularly low factor price of land I regard as perverse.

It is said that this is purely due to quite typical reasons, for example it is said, why are wages of migrant workers in the Pearl River Delta so low? Critics argue that while this is the case, labour mobility should be organised; the government argues that while it is the case, it has nothing to do with us.

However, as we all know, the shortage of migrant labour in 2004 in particular clearly showed that there were non-economic factors behind the "price of labour being on the low side". In my opinion there were three such factors:

(1) A lack of collective bargaining rights: in recent years the system of chambers of commerce has lagged far behind that of labour unions.

(2) The low comparative advantage of China's agriculture is surely an artificially induced factor. Generally speaking, in the present stage of development, agriculture is indisputably a disadvantaged sector. But in the last few years at least, it has been even more disadvantaged than it normally would be, the main reason being that since the tax reforms, the most obvious tax barrier, the farmers' burden has been heavier than that of most other people. That's why there was some mitigation of the abandonment of arable land after the tax-for-fees reform.

(3) Barriers to entering the market, at present only a few places [in the labourt market] are open to entry by migrant workers. These three are non-economic factors; right now it isbeing debated whether they ultimately play a legitimate function, which is to say, is this a failure of government efficacy?

While it might be argued that these are zones where the government should play a role, I feel that in the case of the present government, its role should sometimes be quite the opposite of what it is so often argued to be. For example in the land issue, privatization is now often said to be impractical, and I myself doubt whether it is the optimal institutional choice.

The issue, however, is whether the qualms about the suitability of privatisation of land on the part of "sannong" specialists and of the government are consistent. It is said that privatizing land would produce a social crisis, leading to [civil] war.

Government official say that if land is not privatized, the national economy will be unable to develop so quickly, [but in my view] if it intervenes in land in this fashion, then we can say that it is precisely because land cannot be privatized that land annexation and polarization are taking place, and the danger that a peasant war might develop is due opposite factors [to what are generally supposed].

---

http://finance.sina.com.cn/economist/jingjixueren/20050121/18301313626.shtml

Mystery of the Chinese Economy

Contents

Introduction: Qin Hui and Contemporary China................................David Kelly

Preface to the English Reader...............................................................Qin Hui

1. Command vs Planned Economy: �Dispensability� of the Economic Systems of Central-Eastern Europe & Pre-reform China
2. China�s Economic Development Performance under the Pre-reform System
3. Fin de Si�cle China: Economic Transition, Social Justice & Democracy
4. MBO yes, �MBO year� no�Basic Issues in Ownership Reform
5. The Dialectic of Downsizing: �Value Subtracting� and State-owned Assets
6. Justice in the Economics of Market Transition
7. Tax and Fee Reform, Village Autonomy and Central and Local Finance: Historical Experience and Realistic Options
8. Power, Responsibility and Constitutional Politics: Theory and History of �Large� vs �Small� Government

Mysteries of the Chinese Economy: Key Writings of Qin Hui

Published as three special issues of The Chinese Economy, forthcoming 2005:

Vol. 38, no. 4 (July-Aug)
Vol. 38, no. 5 (Sept-Oct)
Vol. 38, no. 6 (Nov-Dec)

Editor: David Kelly
East Asian Institute
University of Singapore

Translators: David Kelly

Mme Ma Jisen
Chinese Academy of Social Science (ret.)
Beijing

Nongmin Zhongguo (Peasant China)

Qin Hui, Nongmin Zhongguo: Lishi fansi yu shijian xuanze [Peasant China: Historical Reflection and Practical Choice], Zhengzhou: Henan Renmin Chubanshe, 2003 .
Qin Hui, "Guanyu nongmin wentide lishi kaocha" [Historical examination of the peasant problem], 1-11.
_____, "'Xiaonong jingji sixiang' de maozi buneng luan kou" [The label "Small peasant economy thinking" shouldn't be loosely applied], 12-16.
_____, "Bingshui shi gaige yu 'Huang Zongxi dinglü'" [Tax merger reforms and the 'Huang Zongxi law'], 17-23.
_____, "Shuifei gaige, cunmin zizhi yu qianggan ruozhi: lizhide jingyan yu xianshide xuanze" [Tax and fee reform, village autonomy and central and local finance: historical experience and realistic options], 24-41.
_____, "'Youhua peizhi'? 'Tudifuli'?" ['Optimum allocation'? 'Land as welfare'?], 42-53.
_____, "Nongmin liudong, chengshihua, laodong quanyi yu Xibu kaifa" [Peasant mobility, urbanization, labour rights and Western development], 54-81.
_____, "Nongmin liudong yu jingji yaosu peizhi youhua" [Peasant mobility and optimal economic factor allocation], 82-98.
_____, "Xiaorande tugai" [Silent land reform], 100-115.
_____, "Shichang xinhao yu 'nongmin lixing'" [Market signals and 'peasant rationality'], 116-133.
_____, "'Nongmin fudan' wentide fazhan qushi" [Developmental trend of the 'peasants' burden issue], 134-145.
_____, "Zhejiang xiangzhen qiye zhuanzhi anli yanjiu" [Case studies of trnasformation of town and village enterprises in Zhejiang], 146-218.
_____, "Chuantong Zhonghua diguode xiangcun jieceng kongzhi: Han-Tang jiande xiangcun zuzhi" [The underlying rural control of traditional Chinese empires: Han-Tang rural organization], 219-252.
_____, "Gongshe zhi mi" [Riddle of the commune], 253-274.
_____, "Eguo nongmin yanjiushi gaishu ji qianjing zhanwang" [Outline of the history of peasant studies in Russia and its prospects], 275-289.
_____, "Zhongguo nongmin yanjiushi gaishu ji qianjing zhanwang" [Outline of the history of peasant studies in China and its prospects], 290-308.

Qin Hui, Si wu ya, xing you zhi [Unbounded Thought, Regulated Action], Tianjin: Tianjin Renmin Chubanshe, 2002.

Qin Hui, �Xiao chengzhende youdian yu guangkuo tiandide zuowei� [Superiority of small towns and the vast action of heaven], 3-6.

_____, ��Chengshide kongqi�� [�City Air�], 7-10.

_____, ��Laoli dong jin�? �Ziben xi jin�?� [�Labour flows east�? �Capital flows west�?], 11-15.

_____, �Laogong quanyi yu ziben liudong� [Rights of labour and capital flow], 15-21.

_____, ��Youhua peizhi�? �Tudifuli�?� [�Optimum allocation�? �Land as welfare�?], 26-37.

_____, �Bei leng duzhede �zeren� wenti� [The �responsibility� of swindled readers], 38-.

_____, �Toushi �Lixin xianziang�: lishi beijing zhongde chensi� [Seeing through the �Lixin phenomenon�: podering the historical background], 42-47.

_____, ��Xingshizhuyi�, haishi fubai zhi yizhong?� [�Formalism,� or a kind of corruption?], 48-51.

_____, ��Nongmin� yu �nongyezhe�?�nongmin� gainiande dingyi wenti� [�Peasants� and �farmers��?the problem of defining �peasants�], 52-57.

_____, �Renmin gongshe yu chuantong gongtongti� [People�s communes and the traditional community], 58-84.

_____, �Ziyou xianyu �zhuyi�?jinian Tuomasi.Moer� [Liberty is Prior to �ism�?in memory of Thomas More], 126-133.

_____, �Cong �yiwu� dao �zhiyuan�� [From �Duty� to �Volunteerism�], 133-137.

_____, �Chanzu, longru yu �wenhua� bijiao� [Foot-binding, artificial breasts and �cultural� comparison], 149-157.

_____, �Gaobie qiangzhi� [Farewell to Coercion], 85-87.

_____, �Huhan �xin zhongnongzhuyi�� [Calling for �new agrarianism�], 21-25.

_____, �Wenming xingtai shiguande xingshuai� [Rise and fall of the cultural formations approach], 158-166.

_____, ��Liangxin� yu �changshi� jichu shangde �xuewen�� [�Learning� on the basis of �conscious� and �consensus�], 87-90.

_____, �Bi jijin yu ci jijin� [This fund and that fund], 91-95.

_____, �Kanke yu zhizhu de shinian zhuangui� [], 96-99.

Jin Yan and Qin Hui, Jingji zhuangui yu shehui gongzheng [Economic Transition and Social Justice], Zhengzhou: Henan Renmin Chubanshe, 2002 .

Jin Yan and Qin Hui, “Gaobie Yeliqin de shidai” [Farewell to the Yeltsin era], 1-40.

_____, “‘Fen’ zhi zui? Bu ‘fen’ zhi zui?” [A crime to ‘divide’? Or a crime not to?], 41-64.

_____, “Qidian pingdengde chanquan gaige moshi

‘ [The starting point equality ownership reform model], 65-75.

_____, “Chixu wuniande ‘xin Pulagede chun’” [The five year long ‘new Prague spring’], 76-93.

_____, “Cong ‘jieke qiji’ dao ‘jieke xianjing’” [From Czech miracle’ to ‘Czech trap’], 107-121.

_____, “Chanquan gaige yu gongren canyu” [Ownership reform and worker participation], 122-138.

_____, “Cong youpai de ‘baocun liaofa’ dao zuopaide ‘xiuke buke” [From rightwing ‘conservation therapy’ to leftwing ‘shock classes’], 139-162.

_____, “’Youpai Kaiyinsi’ fandui ‘zuopai huobizhuyi’?” [A ‘right-wing Keynes’ versus ‘left-wing monetarists’?], 163-180.

_____, “Re huati yu leng sikao”[Hot talk and cold thinking], 181-216.

_____, “Zhuangui jingjixue zhongde gongzheng wenti” [The problem of justice in transitional economics], 217-239.

_____, “Guanyu Jini xishu yu shehui fenhua wenti” [On the Gini coefficient and the problem of social polarization], 240-248.

_____, “Jujue ‘anshi jilei’ [Reject ‘primitive accumulation’], 249-256.

_____, “Xiandaihua jinzheng zhongde nongmin” [Peasants in the process of modernization], 257-265.

Qin Hui, Gengyunzhe yan: yige nongminxue yanjiuzhede xinlu [Cultivators talk: a mental journey in peasant studies], Jinan: Shandong Jiaoyu Chuban Shehui, 2000.

Qin Hui, “Zongfa nongmin yu shehuizhuyi geming” [Patriarchal peasants and socialist revolution], 3-41.

_____, “Shehui wenhuaguan yu nongmin wenhua lun” [Cultural views of society and the theory of peasant culture], 42-60.

_____, “Nongmin, nongminxue yu shehuide xiandaihua” [Peasants, peasant studies and social modernization], 61-80.

_____, “Dangdai nongmin yanjiude ‘Chayanuofuzhuyi’” [‘Chayanovism’ in contemporary peasant studies], 81-116.

_____, “Houqi Daxi junyingzhuang zhidu chutan” [Latter period of the Daxi military farm system ], 117-164.

_____, “Daxijun zhizhen shiqide nongmin” [Peasants in the period of Daxi military rule], 165-214.

_____, “Fengjian shehuide ‘Guanzhong moshi—tugaiqian Guanzhong nongcun jingji zhiyi”” [Guanzhong model feudal society—The pre-land reform Guanzhong rural economy], 215-240.

_____, “‘Guanzhong moshi� de shehui lishi yuanyuan: Qingchu zhi Minguozhong nongcun jingji yu shehui yanjiu zhi yi: � [HIstorical origins of the �Guanzhong model�], 241-282.

_____, “‘Li tu bu li xiang’” [‘Leaving the land but not countryside’], 283-295.

_____, “Shichang, ‘houshichang’ yu xiandai nongye” [Market, ‘post-market’ and modern agriculture], 296-311.

_____, “90 niandaide nongmin feinonghua: nongmin liudong wenti” [Deruralizng peasants in the 1990s: the peasant mobility problem], 312-327.

_____, “’Nongmin” yu ‘nongyezhe’? ‘nongmin’ gainiande dingyi wenti” [‘Peasants’ and ‘farmers’? The problem of defining ‘peasants’], 328-334.

_____, ‘Nongcun gaige xilie zhi yi: hengchan, hengxin yu tudi’ [Rural reform series no. 1: property, perseverance and land], 335-339.

_____, “Nongcun gaige xilie zhi er: ‘cun’ xi guilai” [Rural reform series no. 2: ‘village,’ come back], 340-345.

_____, “Nongmin wenhua yu gaige” [Peasant culture and reform], 346-350.

_____, “Xiangcun zai shizi lukou?guanyu xiangzhen qiye chanquan gaigede diaocha yu sikao” [Countryside at the crossroads?investigation and reflection on ownership reform in TVEs], 351-355.

_____, “‘Shou la shou, yiqi zou’—Danmai nongmin yu hezuo yundong’ [‘Hand in hand, setting off together’?Danish farmers and the cooperative movement], 356-.

_____, “‘Nongmin, zhengzhi yu geming” Zhongyi xu’ [Preface to Joel Migdal’s Peasants, politics and revolution], 109-116

Qin Hui, Shijian Ziyou [Practical Freedom], Hangzhou: Zhejiang Renmin Chubanshe, 2004

Qin Hui, “Qiangu cangsang hua huji” [Ever-changing talk about household registration], 3-10.

_____, “‘Quandi jikezheng’ yu ‘slum kongjuzheng’” [‘Enclosure-mania’ and ‘slum-phobia’], 11-14.

_____, “‘Pojie ‘maifang quewei’ de beilun” [Dispelling the paradox of ‘absence of the vendor’], 96-104.

_____, “‘Xinli jiyou ‘min’” [Thinking of ‘peasants’ not all you see is ‘customs’], 15-18.

_____, “‘Ji fei ‘daode jingji’, yi fei ‘lixing nongmin’—‘Chuantong Zhonghua tiguode xiangcun juluo yu xiangcun zhili’: Guanzhong yu guangdong zhi bijiao’ xu” [No ‘moral economy’, no ‘rational peasant’—Introduction to traditional imperial China’s rural settlements and village governance: comparison of Guanzhong and Guangdong], 19-20.

_____, “‘Shouzhang gongcheng’ de haichu” [The harm of ‘leadership engineering’], 42-44.

_____, “‘Xiandaihua jincheng zhongde nongmin?Zhongguo yu Su-E zhi bijiao lungang” [Peasants in the progress of modernization?framework for China-Soviet comparison], 21-28.

_____, “‘Dingdian bangfu’ buyao gaocheng ‘shouzhang gongcheng’” [‘To-level help’ must not bring about ‘leadership engineering’], 39-41.

_____, “‘Baituo ‘Huang Zongxi dinglü”, rang nongmin changwo ziji de mingyun” [‘Throw off ‘Huang Zongxi’s Law”, let peasants control their own destinies’], 29-38.

_____, “Haoqiang yu kuli zhi jian: Huaibei xianziang zai fansi” [], 45-50.

_____, “Wei fu bu ren Zhou Zhengyi, wei ren nan fu Sun Dawu” [Zhou Zhengyi wealthy and unjust, Sun Dawu’s wealth thwarted by justice], 51-54.

_____, “‘Chukou’ xinniang baozheng ‘zhiliang’” [‘Export’ brides guarantee ‘quality’?], 55-57.

_____, “‘Jingji ren’ yu daodede dixian” [‘Economic man’ and the moral baseline], 58-62.

_____, “Yi cheng qiu xin, yi shan bi zhen” [Pursue trust with sincerity, goodness demands truth], 63-65.

_____, “Zhuanggui jingjide yanjiu bijia” [Comparative researchon transitional economies], 75-86.

_____,”Yulun jiandu yu ‘you cuo tui ding’” [Oversight of public opinion and ‘erroneous inferences’”], 66-74.

_____, “‘Changsha anli’: guoqi gaigede shizilukou” [The ‘Changsha case’: crossroads for SOE reform], 87-93.

_____, “Yao MBO, buyao ‘MBO nian’” [MBOs, Yes; ‘Year of the MBO,’ No], 94-95.

_____, “‘Jianyuan zengxiao’ yu ‘jiuye youxian’ de ‘bianzheng guanx’—guoyou zichan ‘jianzhi’ miaojue” [The dialectics of ‘downsizing for efficiency’ and ‘employment comes first’—the art of subtracting value from state assets], 103-105.

_____, “Pingchang kandai ‘shangren dangguan,’ renzhen jianshe daiyi zhengzhi’ [Treat ‘businessmen holding office’ as normal, strive to build representative government], 106-114.

_____, “Ren tong ci xin xin tong li, qu jing he bi shang xi tian” [People are like minded, counsel is near at hand], 115-117.

_____, “Yuanshi jilei zhi di yu chengxu zhengyi de you” [Enemies of primitive accumulation and friend of procedural justice], 118-124.

_____, “Ziyou yu gongzheng de dixian zhi shang?Luoerso, nuoqike yu Budi’e san ren ji” [NGOs in China: the third sector in globalization and social transition?in memoriam Rawls, Nozick and Bourdieu], 125-136.

_____, “NGO zai Zhongguo: quanqiuhua jincheng yu shehui zhuanxing de disan bumen” [NGOs in China: the third sector in globalization and social transition], 137-151.

_____, “’Si zai jiali’ haishi ‘si zai yiyuan’” [‘Die at home’ or ‘die in hospital’?], 152-158.

_____, “Gongtongti ‘shehui’da gongtongti—ping Tengnisi Gongtongti yu shehui” [Community—society—big community: on Tönnies’ Gemeinschaft und Gesellchaft], 159-162.

_____, “Keguide fengmao?xu Yu Jie Shanguang shi” [Invaluable spear-point?preface to Yu Jie, Sparking stone], 172-175.

_____, “Cong ‘lishi zhenglun pian’ dao ‘Wixia zhenglun pian’” [From ‘historical poemic’ to ‘martial arts polemic[ movies], 163-171.

_____, “Zai changshide jichu shang sixiang” [Consensus-based thinking], 176-179.

_____, “Shijian ziyou—ziyou gonggong zhishifenzi zhongde ‘guaitu’ yu ‘shenxuejia’” [Practical freedom—‘heretics’ and ‘theologians’ amongst liberal public intellectuals], 180-200.

Qin Hui, Chuantong shi lun [Ten essays on tradition], Shanghai: Fudan Daxue Chubanshe, 2003

Qin Hui, "The underlying rural order of traditional Chinese empires: Han-Tang rural organization," 1-44.

_____, "Vicious circle in Chinese economic history: controlling vs releasing mergers of landed property,
' 45-60.

_____, "Vicious circle in Chinese economic history: suppression and non-suppression of annexation," 61-125.

_____, "From traditional folk charitable organizations to the modern 'third sector'", 127-166.

_____, "Western Confucians may assimilate: deconstructing the 'Legalist-Daoist'" complementarity, 167-248.

_____, "The poor share with the whole world, the rich just look after themselves, 249-260.

_____, "Who, facing which Orient?," 261-294.

_____, "The riddle of the commune," 295-322.

_____, "Land reform = democratic revolution？ Collectivization = socialism?" 323-374.

_____, "From ‘same' to 'equal': the meaning of the term 'equal' in Chinese" 375-404.

Bibliography

Qin Hui, Shijian Ziyou
[Practical Freedom], Hangzhou: Zhejiang Renmin Chubanshe, 2004.

Qin Hui, Nongmin Zhonguo: Lishi fansi yu shijian xuanze
[Peasant China: Historical Reflection and Practical Choice], Zhengzhou: Henan Renmin Chubanshe, 2003.

Qin Hui, Si wu ya, xing you zhi
[Unbounded Thought, Regulated Action], Tianjin: Tianjin renmin Chubanshe, 2002.

Qin Hui and Jin Yan, Jingji zhuangui yu shehui gongzheng
[ Economic Transition and Social Justice], Zhengzhou: Henan Renmin Chubanshe, 2002.

Qin Hui, Gengyunzhe yan: yige nongminxue yanjiuzhede xinlu
[Cultivators talk: an intellectual journey in peasant studies], Jinan: Shandong Jiaoyu Chuban Shehui, 2000.

Qin Hui, Wenti yu Zhuyi
[Issues and Isms], Changchun: Changchun Chubanshe, 1999.

Qin Hui, Zhengfu yu qiye yiwaide xiandaihua [Modernization beyond state or enterprise], Hangzhou: Zhejiang Renmin Chubanshe, 1999.

Qin Hui, Tianping ji
[The Balance], Beijing: Xinhua Chubanshe, 1997.

Qin Hui, Shichangde zuotian yu jintian
[The Market Yesterday and Today] , 1998.

Qin Hui et al., Xueshu Zhongguo
[Academic China], Nanning: Jiangxi Jiaoyu Chubanshe, 1998.

Qin Hui et al., Nongcun gongshe, gaige yu geming
[Rural Communes, Reform and Revolution], Beijing: Zhongyang Bianyi Chubanshe, 1996.